Search

RSF: Taliban Have ‘Weaponized’ Legal System to Suppress Afghanistan’s Press

News image
10 Aug 2026 - 10:57 Yasna Farahmand

The Kabul Tribune (KT)— The Taliban have increasingly formalized restrictions on Afghanistan’s media over the past five years, using laws, directives and administrative orders to control journalism and suppress critical reporting, Reporters Without Borders said in a new report.

The Paris-based press freedom organization said the Taliban have issued more than 20 nationwide directives, in addition to provincial orders, restricting a broad range of media activities since returning to power in August 2021.

The measures have targeted criticism of Taliban officials, political programming, rebroadcasting of international media, women’s participation and voices in the media, the selection of guests and experts, images of living beings and even the terminology journalists are required to use, according to RSF.

The organization said the restrictions initially came through administrative and verbal instructions but have increasingly been incorporated into a formal legal framework.

“This five-year progression has transformed a succession of restrictions into a system designed to control journalism and silence critical voices,” RSF said.

The organization said the process entered a new phase in January 2026 with the introduction of the Taliban’s Criminal Procedure Regulation of the Courts.

According to RSF, the regulation was drafted without public consultation and does not explicitly mention journalists or the media. However, it also provides no specific protections or exceptions for legitimate journalistic work.

RSF said Article 23 gives Taliban judges broad powers that could be used against dissenting and critical views. The organization warned that the provision could expose journalists and commentators to punishment for criticizing officials, communicating with Taliban opponents or reporting on politically sensitive issues.

Célia Mercier of RSF said the regulation effectively puts into law restrictions that had accumulated during five years of Taliban rule.

“With its vague definitions of rebellion, subversion and heresy — and the severe penalties attached to them — the regulation can be a powerful legal instrument for silencing journalists, commentators and other perceived critics,” Mercier said.

RSF also warned that journalists could potentially be forced to provide information about sources or colleagues, threatening the confidentiality of sources and making independent reporting more difficult.

Restrictions began after Taliban takeover

Some of the first nationwide restrictions on the media were introduced within weeks of the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021.

In September 2021, the Taliban government’s media office under the Ministry of Information and Culture introduced what became known as the “11 rules of journalism.”

The rules instructed media organizations not to publish material considered contrary to Islam or insulting to national figures. Journalists were also told to avoid unverified information and content that the authorities considered harmful to public opinion or morale.

The rules also called for media organizations to maintain neutrality, publish factual information and follow journalistic principles.

However, RSF said the directives went beyond general editorial standards. Detailed reports were to be coordinated with the government media office, which also prepared a standardized form for journalists and media organizations.

Later that month, the Taliban issued another directive instructing some television stations in Kabul not to refer to the authorities as the “Taliban group.” Instead, broadcasters were told to use the name “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.”

Women face growing restrictions

Women working in the media soon became subject to additional restrictions.

In November 2021, the Taliban’s Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice introduced guidelines governing female television presenters. Women appearing on television were required to cover their faces except for their eyes, according to RSF.

Restrictions later expanded to women’s voices on radio and in public information.

The Taliban’s Law on the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, introduced in July 2024, codified a provision stating that a woman’s voice should not be heard outside her home, according to RSF.

The law also prohibited broadcasting images of living beings and gave inspectors from the ministry greater authority to monitor published material and public information.

By March 2025, RSF said restrictions on women’s voices had also been incorporated into provincial media directives.

In Kandahar, the provincial Directorate of Information and Culture issued guidelines that prohibited women’s voices on radio and banned the broadcasting of messages from women in entertainment programs.

International broadcasters restricted

The Taliban also moved to restrict the local rebroadcasting of international media.

In March 2022, the Ministry of Information and Culture prohibited Afghan broadcasters from rebroadcasting programs from the U.S.-funded Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty on FM frequencies.

RSF said the Taliban cited content they considered contrary to the national interest and concerns about presenters’ clothing.

In July 2022, Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada issued a decree prohibiting what the authorities described as “unproven allegations” against officials.

RSF said the measure effectively criminalized criticism of government officials.

Former media law abolished

The legal environment changed further in 2024 when the Taliban’s Ministry of Justice announced that laws enacted under the previous government had been repealed, including Afghanistan’s 2015 media law.

RSF said the repeal removed a legal framework that had supported greater media freedom during the previous two decades.

The Taliban said the changes were intended to bring Afghanistan’s laws into conformity with Sharia.

In July 2024, the Law on the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice introduced additional restrictions affecting the media, including restrictions on women’s voices and the broadcasting of images of living beings.

Political programs and guests restricted

In September 2024, the Ministry of Information and Culture introduced further restrictions on broadcasters, according to RSF.

The measures banned live political programs and required media organizations to obtain approval for guests appearing on their programs.

Broadcasters were allowed to invite specialists from a list of more than 68 people designated as experts, RSF said. The rules also prohibited criticism of Taliban laws on air.

By March 2025, provincial directives imposed additional restrictions.

In Kandahar, journalists were instructed to use specific terminology when referring to Taliban leaders and authorities. Radio programs were required to refer to Hibatullah Akhundzada using an honorific title equivalent to “His Excellency Amir al-Mu’minin, may Allah protect him,” while the Taliban government was to be called the “Islamic Emirate.”

The guidelines also required journalists traveling within Kandahar to obtain permits from the provincial Directorate of Information and Culture.

RSF said journalists in other parts of Afghanistan had reported that similar permit requirements were being enforced in other provinces.

The Kandahar directive also instructed journalists and media organizations to describe Taliban officials killed in attacks or other circumstances as “martyrs.”

RSF calls for repeal of restrictions

RSF said the restrictions imposed since 2021 have evolved from controls over editorial content into a broader system governing what journalists can report, whom they can interview and even the language they can use.

The organization said the January 2026 Criminal Procedure Regulation represents the latest and potentially most consequential development because it could provide courts with a legal mechanism to punish critical reporting.

RSF called for the repeal of provisions that restrict journalism on vaguely defined religious, moral or “national interest” grounds and urged the Taliban authorities to protect journalists and press freedom.